Different Terror Attacks
The toxic allure of the call to terror by the so-called Islamic State was on tragic display over three days in two countries. As the
terrorist group suffers persistent and crushing loses, its narrative of an ‘us versus them’ ideology continues to radiate outwards across the globe. Attacks done in the name of the Islamic State represent an enormous threat to local and national security services.
The spreading of terrorism narrative is a key factor which make terror organization was always existing and meantime in another occation the efforts of the government to spread and to intensify social media literation and countering terror ideology did not run well and continuously.
On May 12, in the Opera district of Paris, a French citizen of Chechen background murdered a man with a knife on the street and injured four more people. Police then shot and killed him. Initial reports identified the man as Khamzat Asimov, who was naturalized in 2010. He was reportedly on the ‘fiche S’ terrorism watch list, which currently has over 20,000 people. Like other European countries, France is struggling with a terrorism matrix that is overwhelmed by potential and actual threats; it is impossible for security and intelligence services in a democracy to effectively assess, prioritize, and handle a terror watch list with so many people. The French services have been dealing with an almost unsustainable counterterrorism pace since the November 2015 mass-casualty terrorist attacks in Paris. The Islamic State has claimed responsibility for this latest attack as well.
More than 11,000 kilometers away from France, there was another terrorist attack that appears to be inspired by the Islamic State. On May 13, a family of six conducted three separate attacks against Christian churches in Surabaya, Indonesia. There is some confusion as to whether the family had traveled to Syria for the Islamic State, had attempted to do so but was stopped in Turkey, or if they had stayed in Indonesia. What is clear is that the mother took her two daughters—nine and twelve years old—and walked into the Indonesian Christian Church and detonated an explosive suicide vest. The father then blew himself up in a van parked
outside the Pentecost Central Church; their two sons then drove two motorcycles up to the Santa Maria Catholic Church, where they also detonated explosive suicide vests.
The latest reports are that eight people were murdered in these three attacks in the second largest city in the most populous Muslim
country in the world. Terrorists have long set their sights on churches in Indonesia. In 2000, al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists targeted numerous churches in a plot known as ‘the Christmas Eve Bombings’ that left 19 people dead. On May 14, 2018, there was another attack in Surabaya, again involving a family. Five family members on two motorcycles drove up to the gate of a police headquarters and then detonated at least two explosive devices. Four of the family were killed; an eight-year-old daughter was blown off the motorcycle but survived. Ten people, including four police officers, were injured.
Different with the capability of France’s intelligence apparatus to find who must be responsible on several terror in France, they need several days to find the link of terror perpetrators, but in Indonesia, the communities of an intelligence agency which was coordinated by the State Intelligence Agency (BIN) had been known the link of perpetrators of several attacks at several churches in Surabaya, East Java as fast as after “humiliated actions” had been happened. BIN and other an intelligence agency in Indonesia had been explored and described about the involvement of Jamaah Anshorut Daulah (JAD) under the leadership of firebrand cleric,
Aman Abdurrahman which must be responsible on terror attacks in Surabaya, East Java and also in Pekanbaru, Riau.
The unrelated attacks in two countries, as different and distant from each other as France and Indonesia, again show that while these attacks are technically unrelated they are connected by the ideology of ‘bin Ladenism,’ the terrorist ideology espoused by Usama bin Laden that has continued to spread long after his death. The narrative of groups like the Islamic State and al-Qaeda continues to find a receptive audience among a wide group, from a lone Chechen in France to a family in Indonesia. The
challenge of effectively countering that narrative, without reinforcing its narrative of persecution and discrimination against Muslims, is one of the most difficult counterterrorism challenges facing governments today.
*) Wildan Nasution, Political and security issues observer. Live in Batam, Kepri Islands.